Wiston Papers
Why Americans have lost trust in the news media
Most
Americans distrust the media to provide objective, balanced, accurate
coverage of news and information. That’s the conclusion of a Gallup Poll that shows nearly two of every three citizens today say they have
little or no confidence in news organizations. Only 40 percent of those
surveyed believe we are doing a good job--the lowest figure on record.
As
one who has spent his professional career as a journalism practitioner
and educator, I’m dismayed by the negative reaction of the public to
what we do. But I’m not surprised. And we in the media are fully
responsible for this decline in credibility.
Here’s why.
Today’s
media now insist on publishing stories every hour every day. In
addition to their traditional core news medium, every newspaper,
magazine, and broadcast station uses all communication platforms to
reach its audience. Social Media now are de rigueur.
Editors and reporters in newsrooms are under increased pressure to be
first on Twitter with latest headline. Be first to post a breaking
story on Facebook. Be first to upload video to YouTube or Vimeo. Be
first to send photographs on Pinterest. Be first on Foursquare to tell
where your story is. Be first to compose a Blog expressing your opinion
about the news. And, of course, make sure you publish your regular
broadcast or print version of the story, too.
We
are asked to do too much, too frequently with too few resources. As a
result we make poor editorial decisions, commit factual errors, and
ignore ethical standards.
Here are some examples.
On
September 11 this year NBC’s Today Show did not broadcast the annual
observance ceremony of the terrorist attack of 2001. Instead the
network chose to interview the mother of the Karashian family, Kris Jenner, about her
breast implants.
Also last month ABC News insisted on exposing viewers to daily updates about the photographs of a topless Kate Middleton.
Is it any wonder television is called the boob tube?
When
not obsessed with Ms. Middleton, the networks (un)covered details about
nude pictures of British Prince Harry at a Las Vegas party. Neither
the topless Middleton or the bottomless Harry were important stories.
The networks reported them only because they were easy and they were
visual.
Fox News chose to broadcast live the high-speed police chase of a stolen car. The network stayed with the live transmission even as the suspect
stopped, jumped out of the car and then shot himself to death. Although
Fox News claims it had a five-second delay on the feed, obviously
someone was asleep at the switch and the suicide was seen by viewers.
The
story itself had no value to anyone outside Phoenix, but Fox News
carried it for only two reasons. It had the technology to do so and the
images were compelling. But this was not an important national news
story.
Following
last week’s presidential debate, too many news organizations chose to
speculate about the quality of moderator Jim Lehrer’s performance
instead of analyzing the assertions of the two candidates.
All bad editorial decisions.
Trying
to be first too often means getting it wrong. One of the biggest
domestic news stories this year was the Supreme Court ruling on the
Affordable Care Act (ACA). All news organizations knew weeks in advance
that the decision would be handed down at the end June.
Despite
claims by CNN and Fox News that they had prepared for the moment by
assigning their most seasoned reporters to cover the story, both networks incorrectly reported that the court had overturned the health
care act. In fact, the law was upheld.
CNN and Fox News rushed to break the story first and in their haste
they blew it. It was embarrassing for the two organizations. And it was
inexcusable.
Last
week a North Carolina television reporter, Dan Tordjman, erroneously
tweeted that New York Yankees Second Baseman Robinson Cano would be
suspended by Major League Baseball after testing positive for a
performance-enhancing drug. The story was not true.
It
appears that the tweet was a personal reflection by the journalist and
it was never actually broadcast. However, the tweet went public and
tarnished the reputation of the TV station, the journalist, and Mr.
Cano.
Mr.
Tordjman failed to remember that--as a journalist--he cannot separate
his professional and personal lives when he uses social media. As a
public figure he will always be identified with the new organization for
which he works--like it not.
Every
news news medium has clearly stated codes of ethics that proscribe the
type of behavior that can damage the organization’s credibility and
violate the public’s trust. However, today’s constant deadlines and
imperative to publish simultaneously across multiple platforms have
resulted in too many lapses in professional conduct.
Jonah Lehrer resigned from the The New Yorker magazine in July after admitting that he had made up quotes from musician Bob Dylan for a story Mr. Lehrer wrote.
Fareed Zakaria, of CNN and Time
magazine, was suspended briefly by the two publications when he, too,
confessed that he had plagiarized material for an article in The New Yorker.
Mike Daisey made up information in a public radio documentary about working
conditions in a China factory. The program was taken off the air.
New York Times journalist Jayson Blair fabricated content and stole information from other reporters during his time at the newspaper.
Stephen Glass of The New Republic likewise fabricated elements of his work for the magazine.
USA Today reporter Jack Kelley also incorporated untrue information in his stories.
Photojournalists like Adnan Hajj have manipulated photographs that appeared in news outlets including Reuters.
Gerald Posner of The Daily Beast plagiarized material for his publications.
And
an NBC News producer was fired this year after editing a 911 recording
to make it sound as if George Zimmerman was racially motivated when he
killed Trayvon Martin.
The
news media in the United States have despoiled their reputations as
faithful watchdogs of society. They have betrayed our trust in them as
purveyors of accurate information. They have failed to honor their own
ethical codes that promise honest reporting. Instead of dedicating
themselves to seeking, analyzing, and disseminating stories about
developments and issues of importance, news organizations too often have
opted for speed over accuracy. They are more interested in the
salacious than the significant. They prefer curation of easily
available material rather rather than creation of original content
through enterprise investigation.
It’s
time for the news media to end their misguided practice of 24/7
deadlines and multiple communication platforms in pursuit of consumers
at any cost. As the latest opinion polls demonstrate, their strategy is not working.
Americans no longer have faith in us. And if we continue our current
practices, we do not deserve the public’s trust.
October 08, 2012
No comments:
Post a Comment