Wiston Papers
I'm tweeting. I'm not reporting news.
This
week the headline service Twitter was in the news. The
micro-blogging source continues to evolve and that was recognized
positively by two different sources.
The
preeminent broadcast news organization Radio Television Digital News Association (RTDNA) announced that it would present its First Amendment
Award to Twitter.
According
to the RTDNA news release, the award recognizes those who have
“...played a significant role in dissemination of news and information.”
Furthermore,
continues the RTDNA statement, “Social media has (sic) added a new and
important dimension to information dissemination and Twitter has been in
the forefront of those efforts.”
RTDNF
Executive Director Mike Cavender is quoted. “Millions of people turn
to Twitter as an instant source of information, especially in times of
crisis.”
Two
days later ReadWrite blogger Jon Mitchell captured our attention with
the headline “Watch Out CNN: New Twitter Search Capabilities Will Rule
Breaking News.”
Mitchell
argues that traditional news sites are slower than Twitter and have
less information about what’s happening. He continues by claiming that
Twitter “is increasingly where breaking news emerges. That’s just a
fact.”
No. It is not a fact.
Jon
Mitchell obviously does not understand what Twitter is and the RTDNA
apparently has forgotten what news is. Here is the truth.
Twitter
is a source of rumor, innuendo, speculation, opinions, tips and--on
occasions--a link to actual news. But it is not news itself.
RTDNA
erroneously asserts that Twitter’s limited 140-character messages
constitute significance. In fact, Twitter is nothing more than
headlines. There is no detail, no context, no explanation, no
elaboration and no guarantee of accuracy.
Although Twitter often is first in spreading rumors about breaking news, every posting must be confirmed elsewhere. First is not a synonym for fact.
Mr.
Mitchell incredulously claims most news sites have less information
about what people find interesting. On the contrary. Legitimate news
sites are not limited to Twitter’s 140-character restriction. News
sites have space to provide critical detail and background on news of
interest to people. Twitter cannot and does not do that.
Yes, I tweet about my blog. But I don’t delude myself that I’m disseminating anything more than a tease to my latest opinion. I'm tweeting; I'm not reporting news.
It
is true that social media are increasingly prominent forums for
exchanges of opinions and information But the overwhelming percentage
of content is not actual news. News is information that has been
checked for accuracy. News consumers should have confidence in the
veracity of statements in the story and believe that the journalists who
compile the information strive for fairness and balance. In other
words, news should present the truth.
Twitter
and other social media have a place in contemporary society. But we
should not ascribe to them attributes they do not have nor a role they
do not play.
Let’s
recognize Twitter for what it is. A headline service about topics of
possible interest to families, friends and followers. Actual news about
those topics will be found elsewhere.
Steve Coon
January 09, 2013
No comments:
Post a Comment